Places for Homes visualizes the limitations, opportunities, and tradeoffs in planning for homes. The following are our most overarching takeaways from this analysis, many of which do not come as a surprise. 

Areas in or near community centers and major transportation corridors receive higher scores for residential suitability due to improved transportation access and mobility 

Priority lands for protection due to cultural or ecological significance sometimes overlap with high suitability scores for residential homes from other priority features.  This suggests the need for coordinated planning to ensure we maintain and improve, rather than compete, in efforts for both our homes and our lands of cultural and ecological significance.  

Access to employment and services varies broadly across the region, yet still 30% receive an overall score of moderately-high suitability (6.5 and up). Access to employment received the highest median score while access to education the lowest. Recreation access is well dispersed across the whole region; however, access to employment, education and essential services are more clustered to the largest population centers, in particular the Connecticut River valley corridor that includes Hartford and Norwich VT & Lebanon and Hanover NH.  

The high value clusters, 3 sq. mi. in each municipality, reiterate the importance of existing infrastructure. Other clusters highlight the importance of many variables for a home with some being opportunities for revitalization. 

There are multiple high value areas seen in the Homes Landscape that coincide at the border of two communities, emphasizing the need for collaboration among municipalities and between two states.  

A significant percentage (30%) of new homes in the past decade was built in Non-Study areas, primarily in areas in close proximity to waterbodies. Given the desirability of waterfront properties, municipalities should understand and consider the benefits and risks of new development near our rivers, lakes and ponds, and enact appropriate regulations. 

New homes from the last decade. Approximately 60% of new homes, were located in areas with moderately-high or high residential suitability (6.5/9 or greater). In contrast, only 38% of the entire Homes Landscape falls in this range. This correlation shows the model as a robust sky-level analysis for residential suitability.